Hughes V State 5D14-4516

In this case LE replied to an ad placed on Craigslist by Hughes.  Discussion occurred on one day but Hughes said he could not meet that day.  When LE initiated discussion the next day, they did arrange to meet.  The charges were done as soliciting on one day and travelling for the next.  DJ was granted although there is extensive discussion on if this was a single criminal episode.  There is also a lengthy dissenting opinion by Judge Berger on why the DJ should not have been granted. 

File name HughesVState5D14-4516.pdf File Size 236 Kilobytes File Type pdf (application/pdf) Created Date Saturday, 22 October 2016 Owner Darlene